|
|
|
Home
What's New
Supporting Organizations
The Proposal
Map
Existing Contaminants
Test Results
Voice your concern
Why say NO
How you can help
Advertise
Research
Calendar of Events
Research Summaries
Related Sites
Letters and Publicity
Who I Am
Editorial
Mailing List
|
|
Existing Contaminants
During the community meeting on Thursday, March 2
many people were
absolutely stunned when they were handed photocopies of
several letters and documents
that seem to clearly indicate that contaminated waste
has been dumped at the 19000 Yew Way gravel pit since
approximately October, 2003. Moreover, contaminated waste may
have been dumped at other sites in the greater Seattle area.
All of the documents listed below are public record and available
from the
Snohomish Health District.
I have scanned the documents and posted them here for
your convenience.
If you have a private well and live in the vicinity of
the gravel pit at 19000 Yew Way in Maltby, it would be
prudent to have your well
water tested as soon as possible for
heavy metals, arsenic, cadmium, and chromium.
Gary Hajek of the
Cross Valley Water District
has been alerted to this situation
as of the morning of March 6. Please take 15 minutes of your
time to
voice your concern
to your elected officials about this dangerous situation.
Thanks to KING TV (channel 5) for
airing
our community's concerns on their March 13
evening news.
I read through the letters and documents several times and have
done our best to reconstruct a timeline of events. I may or may
not be 100% accurate here, but I strive to remain factual throughout
this entire website (except when including personal opinion on the
Editorial
page!).
You will need the free software
Adobe Acrobat Reader
(version 5 or higher) to view the documents that are listed below.
Please let me know if you find any errors or enhancements to this information.
 |
 |
March 19, 2004 |
The Snohomish Health District sends a memo to
Rinker Materials
to reaffirm that they are not importing inert waste at either
the Maltby site or the Proctor Creek site. The memo then
reminds Rinker Materials that if the situation changes and either
operation accepts materials such as concrete, asphalt, contaminated
dirt, or other waste deemed a solid waste or hazardous waste
as fill material, then a solid-waste handling permit
will be required.
download the memo (1.4 Mb)
|
 |
 |
October 28, 2005 |
The Snohomish Health District observes several unusual truckloads
of a brownish-red viscous material with a fish-like odor
being deposited into Rinker Material's Inert Waste Landfill
at 6300 Glenwood Avenue in Everett.
The Snohomish Health District employee is told that the material
originated at the Tolt Treatment Facility near Duvall, and the
material is apparently the backwash solids from the treatment
facility's water filters. The material is being deposited
at Rinker Materials as reclamation fill. It is also disclosed
that this same material was deposited about
two years ago at the non-permitted landfill
at Yew Way in Maltby.
|
 |
 |
December 7-9, 2005 |
American Water Services conducts tests at both the Everett and Maltby facilities.
It appears that Rinker Materials is the "client" for the tests at the Everett
facility and the Snohomish Health District is the "client" for the tests at
the Maltby facility. Tests at both facilities clearly exceed accepted
standards in one or more categories. Please see our
matrix
near the
bottom of this page since it will help you interpret the test results.
download the test results (0.1 Mb)
|
 |
 |
December 12, 2005 |
The Snohomish Health District formally advises Rinker Materials
of the October 28 event at the site at 6300 Glenwood Avenue in Everett.
The memo goes on to discuss how the Snohomish Health District contacted
American Water Services for clarification. The memo then discusses
that approximately 1,660 tons of the backwash solids have been deposited
at the Everett facility. The Snohomish Health District advises Rinker
Materials that the waste material must be removed within 45 days, and
that the District is still reviewing the situation for the Yew Way
site in Maltby.
download the memo (0.1 Mb)
|
 |
 |
December 30, 2005 |
Rinker Materials responds to the Snohomish Health District, stating that
based on the results of the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procecure (SPLP)
tests and results of the Total Organic Carbon testing, removal of the
material in question is not necessary.
download the memo (0.1 Mb)
|
 |
 |
February 3, 2006 |
The Snohomish Health District formally responds to Rinker Materials'
memo of December 30, 2005.
Rinker Materials is advised that the Snohomish Health District does not
agree with their analysis, and that the Department of Ecology agrees
with the District's interpretation.
Rinker Materials is ordered to submit a plan
for removal and abate this violation from both sites within 60 days
(approximately April 1, 2006), and is advised that an inspection will
be conducted on April 4, 2006 to determine compliance.
download the memo (0.1 Mb)
|
I placed the December 9, 2005 test results
(for the 19000 Yew Way gravel pit only)
into a matrix here for ease of reading. The abbreviation ppm
is parts per million, and the abbreviation ppb
is parts per billion.
I assume that the abbreviation SPLP refers to the
Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure.
 |
 |
Arsenic |
14.3 ppm |
Tolerance level is 20 ppm.
|
 |
 |
Arsenic SPLP |
2 ppb |
In exceedance of Department of Ecology's Ground Water
Contaminant Levels.
Tolerance level is 0.05 ppb.
|
 |
 |
Cadmium |
4.94 ppm |
In exceedance of Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA)
Method A Soil Cleanup Levels
for Unrestricted Land Uses. Tolerance level is 2 ppm.
|
 |
 |
Cadmium SPLP |
no data? |
|
 |
 |
Chromium |
31.5 ppm |
In exceedance of Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA)
Method A Soil Cleanup Levels
for Unrestricted Land Uses. Tolerance level is 19 ppm for Chromium VI
and 2,000 ppm for Chromium III.
|
 |
 |
Chromium SPLP |
no data? |
Tolerance level is 50 ppb (total).
|
 |
 |
Lead |
23.2 ppm |
|
 |
 |
Lead SPLP |
0.015 ppm |
Tolerance is 50 ppb.
|
We had record rainfall this Winter, and it appears that any of the
heavy metals, arsenic, cadmium, or chromium
are quite capable of leaching into the soil. Moreover, there is an aquifer
in the Maltby area that may span as far West as the
Little Bear Creek area (just West of SR 9). I have been told that
there was an incident at
the Yew Way gravel pit in the 1980's where someone
broke through to the water table.
In addition, there are two previous court cases that
would seem to establish a trend/history
of contaminents at the gravel pit.
- In approximately February of 1988, court case
#88-2-00197-7 in the Superior Court of Snohomish County.
"...defendant has authorized dumping black gelatinous material
into the South pond, which included diesel oil and other
wastes. The pond is the surface expression of the local
water aquifer."
- In approximately 2001 to 2002, court case
#01-2-10297-2 in the Superior Court of the State of Washington.
"Plaintiffs' investigation into past uses of the Maltby Pit
revealed that the contamination, including oil, diesel fuel,
petroleum hydrocarbons and PCBs, was located in the area
of the Maltby Pit where an old mechanic's shop building
used to stand".
This case indicates that a remediation plan
was executed at the gravel pit.
How does the possibility of contaminated soil relate back to MXGP's
proposal?
Phase 1 of the proposal involves importing 200,000 cubic yards (CY's)
of soil and a significant regrade to the Southern two thirds of the 58 acres.
Phase 2 of the proposal involves importing 700,000 CY's of soil
and a significant regrade to the North end of the 58 acres.
If there is indeed contaminated soil at the gravel pit then it CANNOT be
allowed to blend with imported soil or be buried under imported soil.
Any contaminated soil must be dealt with such that it meets all
local, State, and Federal standards. Many people are immediately concerned
about water quality, and then concerned for
the environment, salmon habitats, and so on.
|